A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2018. 11. 28. 00:35경 서울 B에 있는 'C주점' 앞 도로에서 '취객이 영업방해를 한다'는 주점의 112신고를 받고 출동한 서울금천경찰서 D파출소 소속 순경 E로부터 ‘영업에 방해되는 행동을 하지 말고 귀가하라’고 권유받자 "내가 왜 너의 말을 들어야 되냐, 경찰관 너 죽여버린다, 총으로 쏴 버린다"라는 등 욕설을 하며 주먹을 들어 위 경찰관을 때릴 듯이 위협하고 손으로 위 경찰관의 가슴을 수 회 밀치고 주먹으로 위 경찰관의 얼굴을 때려 넘어뜨리는 등 폭행하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal report (afy campaigns and motion picture for a victim police officer);

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. It appears that the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is recognized and reflected in the suspended sentence, taking full account of the following circumstances: although not having the same kind of criminal record, it appears that the three-time fine has been committed in relation to violence; and the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime; and the circumstances after the crime, etc., which are the sentencing conditions appearing in the records and arguments of the