logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2018.11.09 2018나35909
제3자이의
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is that, in full view of the overall purport of arguments between the 10th and 12th of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, the representative of the church is responsible for holding the church as a member of the church (the chairperson of the church), and the church shall be the representative of the church (the representative of the church), the joint meeting, the director of the church, and the chairman of the church. Therefore, the representative of the church shall be subject to re-payment of all acts of the affiliated organizations (the representative of the church) [Article 20 of the Civil Procedure Act], since the articles of incorporation was amended (Evidence No. 13) on December 30, 209, and the whole purport of the argument was stated in the evidence No. 13 and No. 23, and even if the defendant did not have any dispute over the payment period, the evidence No. 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance that "No. 3 of this case was submitted by the chairperson of the court of first instance," and that "No. 8 of this case shall be accepted.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow