logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2018.01.10 2016가단55724
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 1,000,00 for each of the Plaintiff A and B; and (b) KRW 13,782,739 for each of the Plaintiff C and each of them from January 29, 2015.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant is opening and operating a skiing school while operating the Eski ground located in Chuncheon City (hereinafter “ski ground of this case”).

B. On January 29, 2015, Plaintiff B registered Plaintiff C (FFs) and Chokman G, who is ancillary to the process of Ski School’s day (M. P.M.) in the instant skiing ground.

At the time, Plaintiff B applied for the registration of Plaintiff C and G, which was the basis, rank, rank, rank, rank, rank, or higher.

C. At around 10:00 on January 29, 2015, H, a skiing instructor belonging to the Defendant, took a skiing course in Plaintiff C and G, and did not notify Plaintiff B, a guardian, after the point of occupation, and had Plaintiff C and G, “I will not get off. I will not get off” while having Plaintiff C and C pay “I will be able to go off. I will get Plaintiff C to go off the middle-class Skir Ski.”

However, the Plaintiff C suffered bodily injury from the left-hand border, fellle, and sallle, since she passed through the salves of the mid-to-salute Skis at around 14:00 on the same day, since she was unable to cope with the speed of skiing and lost balance.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). 【The ground for recognition / [the ground for recognition] written in Gap’s Evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 11, and 14 (including virtual numbers), and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. In addition to the descriptions of Gap evidence Nos. 10, 12, and 13 in the above facts of recognition of liability, H, an instructor of a skiing school, without considering the degree of Ski training, shall be found to have caused an accident that the plaintiff C, who applied for the basic team, unlawfully instructs the plaintiff C, who applied for the foundation team, to be active in the middle-class Ski Ski training without considering the degree of Ski training, leading the plaintiff C to be active in the middle-class Ski training so that the plaintiff C could not control the speed. This is not a method of guidance or determination that meets the level of the plaintiff C, or a method of safely exceeding the level of guidance or determination.

arrow