A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 11:00 on July 25, 2017, the Defendant refused to sell alcoholic beverages on the grounds of pre-contractedd customers, etc. from the injured party in E cafeteria operated by the victim D, and at around 21:50 on the same day, the Defendant obstructed the Defendant’s operation of the cafeteria by force of approximately 15 minutes by avoiding disturbances, such as where the Defendant was found in the said cafeteria, and had the customer in the said cafeteria, and had the customer in the said cafeteria again been suffering from alcohol.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the draft D;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Taking into account all the conditions of various sentencing specified in the instant argument on the grounds of protection and observation of protection and the sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Act; in particular, the following circumstances reflects the following circumstances; the circumstances unfavorable to the victim: The Defendant committed the instant crime even though he/she was punished several times for violent crimes, such as obstruction of performance of official duties, etc. (including two times the suspension of the execution of imprisonment with prison labor), and the attitude of committing the instant crime was bad;