The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Sentencing sentencing on the gist of reasons for appeal

2. The lower court determined that: (a) the Defendant repeatedly committed each crime within a short period of time during the period of the same repeated crime; (b) under the circumstances unfavorable to the Defendant’s previous convictions in addition to the above previous convictions, the confession and reflect of the crime; and (c) under favorable circumstances, the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime; and (d) the sentencing guidelines were determined by comprehensively taking account of the following factors: (a) the Defendant’s age, sex, motive, means

The appellate court, compared to the first instance court, has no change in the conditions of sentencing, and the first instance sentencing does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect the first instance sentencing judgment.

Defendant was under the influence of alcohol and led to each crime while living alone.

Although it is recognized that the crime is closely reflected in the court below, it is also considered in the court below, so the sentencing condition prior to the trial was significantly changed.

It is difficult to see it.

In light of the fact that the above sentencing is too unreasonable, it cannot be deemed that the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.