logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.11.28 2012고정3098
부동산강제집행효용침해등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,00, and by a fine of KRW 2,500,000, respectively.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

D is the lessee of the victim F-owned building in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the lessee of the building, the sub-lessee of the building, and the defendant B, the Seoul Northern District Court of Seoul Northern District on January 19, 201, sentenced to imprisonment for fraud on June 10, 201 and the above judgment became final and conclusive on June 10, 201, and is in a transaction relationship with G, H children of the defendant G, and the defendant A are the same children of G.

1. The Defendant, at around 14:40 on November 10, 2010, tried to stop the entrance door of the building in front of the building in front of the building in question on the ground that the victim F (59 years of age) was tryed to stop, Defendant B’s injury caused the victim’s loss by cutting off the entrance of the building in front of the building in front of the building in front of the building, and caused the victim to go beyond the floor, and caused the victim to go beyond the floor, resulting in an unsatisfin

2. On November 10, 2010, an execution officer I belonging to the Seoul Central District Court for the effect of compulsory execution against the Defendants’ real estate was to enforce the order of the said building by means of the authentic copy of the protocol of settlement of the case involving the name of the building name No. 2010,154 in the above building according to the creditor F’s delegation of enforcement from the above building.

Nevertheless, in collusion with J, the Defendants, who are employees of G, H and G, occupied the above building on the same day and occupied it without permission until November 12, 2010, and obstructed the entrance door by a vehicle, thereby impairing the utility of compulsory execution, such as intrusion on the real estate ordered by compulsory execution.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement made by a witness F in the fifth trial records;

1. Each part of the statement made in F in the suspect examination protocol of Defendant B by the prosecution;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding F;

1. Statement made by the police of the F;

1. A medical certificate;

1. A statement on compulsory execution, report on non-delivery of real estate, lease contract, copy of passbook account, guidance of compulsory execution, and report on moving to the site of violent incidents;

1. Each photograph, video CD;

1. An investigation report (verification of a CD submitted by a complainant) - ten copies of a caps photograph;

1. Previous offense: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning criminal records;

1. Article 140-2 of the Criminal Act and Article 140-2 of the Act on the Selection of Punishment and Punishment A;

arrow