1. The plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Basic Facts

The defendant is a clan with a unique meaning formed for the purpose of protecting the graves of a vessel and promoting the friendship of descendants by jointly setting P21 years old Q Q as a joint set, and the plaintiffs are the descendants of 26 years old and older, and the heirs of 28 years old and older, who are the descendants of 26 years old and older, and the descendants of 27 years old and older, who are the descendants of R.

The existing forest register and the certified copy of the register concerning the forest of this case

6. 25. A disaster occurred, R restored the forest register on May 1, 1955 on the basis of the cadastral source map for the instant forest land in accordance with the implementation provision of the shipbuilding and Forest Survey Decree, the name of J was written.

Since then, based on K, L, M, and N’s preservation (hereinafter “instant preservation registration”) based on the Act on Special Measures for the Registration of Forest Ownership on June 19, 1970 (amended by Act No. 2111, May 21, 1969; hereinafter “Special Measures for Forest”) with respect to the forest of this case, the registration of ownership transfer in the Defendant’s name was completed on October 15, 1972 based on the Act on Special Measures for the Registration, etc. of Ownership Transfer (amended by Act No. 3094, Feb. 18, 1985; hereinafter “Special Measures for Real Estate”).

(2) The Plaintiff filed a claim for cancellation of ownership transfer registration on the premise that the Plaintiff did not file a claim for cancellation of ownership transfer registration on the ground that: (a) the Plaintiff filed a claim for cancellation of ownership transfer registration on the following grounds: (b) the Plaintiff did not file a claim for cancellation of ownership transfer registration on the following grounds: (c) the Plaintiff filed a claim with the Daejeon District Court 2008Gahap1083, and (d) the Plaintiff filed a claim for cancellation of ownership transfer registration on the premise that the ownership transfer registration was not owned by 3,669 square meters in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Daejeon District Court 208, and 11 square meters in Seo-gu, Daejeon Special Metropolitan City, Daejeon Special Metropolitan City; (b) 198 square meters in size; (c) 1,580 square meters in size; (d) 397 square meters in size prior to AB; (e) 4,489 square meters in size prior to AC; (e) 3,084 square meters in size prior to AD;

S is dissatisfied with this.