1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. During the disposition, the Plaintiff’s short-term visit of sojourn status (C-3) on August 2, 2015, the date of entry into the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Pakistan (hereinafter “instant disposition”) of the date of application for refugee status recognition (C-3) on August 26, 2015: (a) the fact that there is no dispute as to the grounds for recognition of refugee status non-recognition: (b) the fact that there is no ground for recognition of the decision of the decision of the decision of the decision of April 21, 2017 as of November 1, 2016 of the date of application for objection that no sufficient fear of refugee status recognition could be recognized: (c) the statement in subparagraphs 1, 2, and 1 and 2, and the purport of the entire pleadings; and (c) the purport of the entire pleadings as of

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion is a national of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan (hereinafter “Pakic Republic”).

The plaintiff succeeded to the land from the Ginaland, which was alleged by the plaintiff that the plaintiff received a large number of properties specially from the Rinaland, and was threatened with the third village and the private village.

Accordingly, the plaintiff has been in the Republic of Korea regardless of Pakistan.

As such, the Plaintiff needs to be recognized as a refugee because it is likely to threaten another person from the three villages and the historical villages, if he/she returns to Pakistan.

B. Article 2 Subparag. 1 of the Refugee Act defines a refugee as “a foreigner who is unable to be protected or does not want to be protected from the country of nationality due to well-founded fear to recognize that he/she may be injured on the grounds of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group, or political opinion, or who, due to such fear, does not want to return to the country in which he/she had resided before entering the Republic of Korea, or who is a state of nationality and who does not want to return.

The threat of the Plaintiff’s return to the instant case is due to the conflict between the family members surrounding the inherited property, which is the reason for recognition of refugee status as defined in the Refugee Act, i.e., race, religion, nationality, membership of a specific social group, or political opinion.