logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 상주지원 2019.10.15 2019고단222
산업안전보건법위반등
Text

[Defendant A] Defendant A shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

Defendant

A fails to pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person in charge of operating C (representative D) in a substantial manner from around 1997 and controlling the safety in the emotional room, and Defendant B is a person who operates the vehicle in the Do administration factory of the above C.

1. At around 11:00 on October 1, 2018, Defendant B’s occupational injury, death, etc.: (a) on the ground that 400 liters, which was adjacent to a Do refining plant C located in E at the time of permanent residence, interfered with the passage of cargo vehicles, Defendant F (V, 48 years old) had the victim F (F) put the oil in double hand and put the oil in center; and (b) if the Defendant puts one of the left side of the oil truck on the part of the Defendant, she had G enter the oil ties into the lower part of the oil tank, thereby complying with the horizontal balance of the oil tank.

Since the above oil tank was at least 2/3 of the oil tank, and it is likely that the above oil tank is used by or is used by one person to the extent that it is impossible to support, human life damage is anticipated. In such a case, the defendant, who carries out the pertinent work by taking the oil tank, has a duty of care to prevent an accident that covers people by taking advantage of the oil tank, by taking the oil remaining in the pre-work oil tank, and by taking it off in another place, and by giving the workers an order to wear safety equipment, such as a safety cap, etc., such as a safety cap, etc., and then, the defendant, who takes part in the pertinent work by taking advantage of the above-mentioned oil tank, has a duty of care to tightly tightly tightly tightly tightly tightly tightly tightly tightly tightly tightly tightly tightly tightly

Nevertheless, by occupational negligence, the Defendant did not take safety measures such as fixing oil oil oil, and the Defendant’s head was kid between the victim’s head and the oil tanker’s backboard.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s above occupational duties.

arrow