A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months and by a fine of 600,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (a disturbance for the cancellation of official order) (a violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act) (a violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act) on August 31, 2018, from around 01:30 to around 02:40 the same day, at the district belt of the Daejeon Pungsung Police Station located in Pungdong-gu C, and a police officer who was working in his/her place under the influence of alcohol was placed in the detention room. The Defendant was able to die.

There are several persons who want to die.

Does the criminal cases should be included in the personal records.

B. If the defendant is sent to the detention room, he shall be involved in the accident.

How is the case may be brought to the detention room.

The government, while under the influence of alcohol by avoiding the disturbance for about 10 minutes, such as the so called "diculous," had a very rough speech and behavior in the government office.

2. On August 31, 2018, the Defendant who interfered with the performance of official duties requested the captain to return home from the head of the police station E (29 years old) who belongs to the said police station at the above location at around 02:40 on August 31, 2018.

different types.

Transmission of Egypts

Dograsium

The balth of the balth E with his hand was shaking the balth of the border E.

As a result, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention of crimes and the maintenance of order by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Each damaged photograph;

1. Application of CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes

1. Article 3 (3) 1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act applicable to the crimes (the fact that the official document is in a disturbance for cancellation, the selection of fines) and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the fact that the crime interferes with the performance of official duties, the selection of imprisonment with labor);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act and Article 38 (1) 3 of the same Act concerning the aggravation of concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. In light of the fact that the defendant committed the instant crime even though he/she had the record of punishment for the reasons of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order and the order to attend lectures, and the fact that the nature of the instant crime is not good in light of the method and content of the instant crime, the Defendant’s liability is unlimited, but the Defendant’s confession is against himself/herself.