beta
Text
1. All appeals by the defendant against the plaintiffs are dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
purport, purport, and.
Reasons
1. The grounds for the acceptance and alteration of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows, and such reasoning is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except for dismissal or addition as follows.
Part 5, Paragraph 7, from "the old land of this case" to 10, are as follows.
“The land subject to the instant land” was divided on June 14, 1983 into AR 1,429 square meters and reduced to 7,497 square meters. The land subject to the instant land was changed to 35,735 square meters of AP forests and fields in combination with AS, AT, AU forests and fields, the area of which was reduced to 7,497 square meters. The land subject to the instant land was changed to 35,735 square meters of AP forests and fields, which was combined with AS, AT, and AU forests and fields. Here, on April 24, 2006, the land subject to the instant land was changed to 339 square meters of AV forests and fields, and was caused to the instant land. Accordingly, the following parts are added to the first part of the previous land.”
(B) The defendant stated G as the owner of the land of this case on the record of incorporation into reserved forests prepared in 1935, but according to the Eul evidence No. 6 (Forest Register), the ownership was transferred to the "AZ" presumed to be Japan (which was divided into Q, BA, and A), and the property owned by Japan after the Sea was reverted to the United States Armed Forces by the case on the acquisition of property rights in Japan located within the "U.S. military law No. 33, Sep. 11, 1948, the ownership was transferred to the Government of the Republic of Korea under Article 5, and Article 2 of the Act on Special Measures for the Disposal of Property Belonging was stipulated as property devolvingly devolved, and the sale contract was not concluded without compensation by the end of December 196, 196.
However, in full view of the following circumstances, the defendant.