1. Each of the plaintiffs' claims is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiffs, who is a national of the Republic of Ghana, and Plaintiff A entered the Republic of Korea as a short-term visit (C-3) on March 6, 2018, and gave birth to Plaintiff B on C.

B. On March 30, 2018, Plaintiff A filed an application for refugee status with each Defendant on January 24, 2019. On April 11, 2019, the Defendant rendered a decision on refugee status refusal (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the grounds for filing an application for refugee status recognition with the Plaintiffs do not constitute “a well-founded fear that is likely to be injured” as prescribed by the requirements of refugee status under Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Agreement”) and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Protocol”).

C. The Plaintiffs filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on April 22, 2019, but the Minister of Justice dismissed the objection on December 23, 2019.

[Ground of Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 8, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's assertion that the plaintiff A sold a drug called Malar treatment worker in his own country with an explanation that the abortion effect exists if two women take the drug like other medicine. The women who take the above drug died while being treated at the hospital due to her outing, and the family members who taken flasium died of the plaintiff's flasium and died of the plaintiff's flasium and the above plaintiff's assault was committed against the plaintiff's flasium. For this reason, if the plaintiffs return to flasium's home country, it is likely that the plaintiffs will continuously be threatened by these threats.

Nevertheless, the defendant's disposition of this case which did not recognize the plaintiffs as refugee should be revoked in an unlawful manner.

B. Determination 1 of the Refugee Act provides for matters concerning the status, treatment, etc. of refugees in accordance with the Refugee Convention and the Refugee Protocol.