A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a CM7 car.

around 16:40 on October 27, 2015, the Defendant driven the said car from the Scandae ecological park located in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and continued to drive the said car from the south side to the Scagle of the street.

At all times, there was a duty of care to ensure safe operation by observing the signal to a person engaged in driving service of a car because the signal is an intersection where it is installed.

Nevertheless, the defendant is required to stop the left-hand vehicle due to the left-hand signal, but the defendant has been driving the victim D(W, 68 years old) who was driving on the left-hand turn by neglecting the above signal due to the occupational negligence when disregarding the above signal.

E Launaly, the front right part of the EM7 car is shocked by the upper right part of the above SM7 car, and as a result, the above SM7 passenger car stops rapidly, thereby complying with the signal from the lower side to the front part of the veterans hospital and driving by the victim F (n. 42 years old) who was left left.

The upper part of the upper part of the G-learning car was shocked by the left part of the said SM7 car.

Ultimately, the Defendant, due to the above occupational negligence, inflicted an injury on the victim D, such as typ scopical scopical base that requires approximately three weeks of treatment on the part of the victim H (n, 62 years of age) who was on the part of the victim D, suffered an injury on the part of the victim F for approximately two weeks of treatment, such as scopher and tensions and tensions that require approximately two weeks of treatment on the part of the victim F, and at the same time, 969,527 won of the repair cost, such as repair on the right side of the victim D, with the above scopher car owned by the victim D being 9,527 won, without taking necessary measures, such as immediately stopping the said scopher car, such as exchanging the front scoper with the victim F, and making it difficult for the victim F to immediately stop.

Summary of Evidence

1...