The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. The Defendant, as defamation victim B, is D’s employee, a foreign company, such as the victim B.

On January 14, 2016, the Defendant, using the Changwon-si E apartment complex in Changwon-si, and smartphones 306 dong 1703 1703, slandered the president to have “C(D) female employees gather” in the Internet car page in order to lock up the office and occupy the office, but, on the other hand, the president continued to join the Democratic Nowon-gu in favor of employees who did not hear their demand, and withdrawn from the labor union that did not intend to be the same.

By doing so, all the employees feel a sense of shame, such as the division of president and the division of alcohol into two parts, etc.

The purpose of this article was to damage the reputation of the victim by openly posting his/her writing.

나. 협박 피고인은 2016. 3. 4. 15:00 경 경남 함안군 F에 있는 C 식당에서 위 피해자에게 “ 내서 B 서방이 있는 부서까지 내가 알아 놨어요.

Doglar, a photographed and sealed at a meeting place, to be Manuri and Gagra;

요래 돼 가지고 찍어 놓은 거, 그게 지금 도로 공사 옷 입고 그게 뉴스에 떴을 때는 어떤 여파가 오겠어요

As a result, we can say that the majority of the Dong that has been sold is that all members of our association are running in whole, so that all members of our association are different, I will not say that all of the members of our association."

that it should not have a firm mind.

On March 8, 198, the reporters of the Republic of Korea, once on March 8, 200, and the reporters of the Republic of Korea have begun before now, and they have been peculiar;

From the old end of the road construction in Korea, it is true that there was a thickness, a special type of fluority.

The reporters now open a physical area and frequently contact with them, and if you see, they can see the blurged so far as they can be left by the lurged distance;

As a result, if there is no solution, it is distributed to the reporter.

“Intimidating the victim”, the victim was threatened.

2. Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 307 of the Criminal Act apply to the facts charged of judgment.