logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 포항지원 2016.09.08 2016고단751
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On July 5, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Daegu High Court, etc., and was sentenced to a fine of KRW 5 million on October 31, 2013, in the Daegu District Court Port Support, which was sentenced to a fine of KRW 5 million due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving).

On January 22, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment with prison labor in the Daegu District Court Port Branch for the crime of conflict, etc., and completed the execution of the sentence on July 24, 2015.

[2016 Highest 751] Even if the Defendant had a driving force twice or more as above, the Defendant driven 49C occ, without a motor device driver’s license in the area of about 2 km between the East Sea market near the South-gu Sea-do Sea-dong on May 4, 2016 and the front road of the beneficiary-care center located in the area of the same air space and 56cc, and operated 49C occ, where he did not have a mandatory insurance policy under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.069%.

[2016 Highest 907]

1. Performance of official duties;

A. At around 15:00 on September 23, 2015, the Defendant: (a) filed an application for basic supply and demand with the D Service Center located in Nam-gu, Nam-gu; (b) however, (c) from E (n) who is a public official in charge, the Defendant’s wife F and G, who lives in the documents unclaimed and protective facilities, appear to be the recipient; (d) the Defendant’s wife F and G, who were living in the documents unclaimed and protective facilities, appear to have avoided the Defendant’s left-hand side; and (e) threatened E by 20 minutes, “If the Defendant was selected as the basic recipient, it will be said that there will be a lot of No. 36 years old.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties by E, a public official in charge of welfare counseling.

B. At around 15:00 on June 7, 2016, the Defendant: (a) entered the 11th floor H of the Pohang-gu, Nam-gu, Dongg, the Defendant’s father’s wife, into the protection agency; and (b) was a public official who is in charge of the management of G, who is a public official of the Republic of Korea (53 years of age) who is responsible for living expenses under the name of G, and was in charge of raising the complaint; and (c) the Defendant was in charge of the public official of the Republic of Korea.

arrow