logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2014.06.19 2013고단8579
사기
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around October 2007, the Defendants borrowed 1200 million won from a third party at the time of Kimpo-si as well as the amount of KRW 12,000,000,000 from a third party. From April 2, 2002 to March 29, 201, there was approximately KRW 500,000 from financial rights and bonds (an increase of KRW 4 million as of March 16, 2012). The Defendants were not aware of the fact that there was no operation due to the trust, and were used to prevent the repayment of interest on the existing debt, and even if they borrowed money from the victim E, they did not have any intent and ability to repay it on the date of promise.

Nevertheless, around May 20, 201, the Defendants found the victim at the victim’s house located in Yeonsu-gu Incheon Metropolitan City by introducing G in which the Defendants work at the restaurant of the Party under the conditions of the performance of the obligation to perform the obligation to perform the obligation to perform the obligation to perform the obligation to perform the obligation to perform the obligation to perform the obligation to deposit the obligation to deposit the obligation to deposit the obligation to deposit the obligation to deposit the obligation to deposit the obligation to deposit the obligation to deposit the obligation to deposit the obligation to deposit the obligation to deposit the obligation to deposit the obligation to deposit the obligation to deposit the obligation to deposit the obligation to deposit the obligation to deposit the obligation to deposit the obligation.

As a result, the Defendants conspired with the victim to make a false statement, and acquired 30 million won from the victim.

The Defendants, “2014 Highest 10,” were married in a de facto marital relationship, and from around 2007, Kim Jong-si operated the right to demand the payment of the contract in the name of “Hpoter Party” in Kim Jong-si.

On January 27, 2011, the Defendants stated that “The Defendants shall pay the Defendant with the time limit provided to the Defendant, if they lend money.”

However, in fact, the Defendants did not have any intent or ability to repay the money even if they borrowed the money, because they were to bear obligations exceeding 100 million won, and were to pay the money in the form of a “defluence” with the burden of payment in excess of 100 million won.

Nevertheless, the Defendants were sentenced to KRW 20 million for the same day from the victim as above and received 20 million from the victim on the same day.

arrow