logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2016.08.19 2015고정608
재물손괴등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 26, 2015, the Defendant: (a) visited the restaurant called “D,” while drunk, and called “D,” and called “the victim E (46 years, inn, inn) who is the principal restaurant, shall receive more than two customers without being a single customer”; (b) on the ground that the Defendant: (c) visited the restaurant, where he/she was the head of the restaurant.”

1.3 Mauritiuss;

Chyman had been engaged in funeral services.

"The Domination" caused damage to the Domination of 250,000 won by breaking two dominations at the entrance of the floor by putting them up on the floor, breaking them up and destroying the Domination.

2. The Defendant assaulted the victim on the date and time set forth in paragraph 1, at the same place, and on the same grounds, the victim’s bucks, following the elbbbbbbing that fucks that fucks fucks fuck in the victim’s bucks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Each police statement made to E and F;

1. A report on investigation;

1. On the spot and photographs of damage [the statement of a witness, victim, or witness at the scene and on-site conditions at the time (the damaged person, as alleged by the defendant, destroyed a fire in his/her possession without any special reason;

In full view of the general rule of experience, it is recognized that the defendant has damaged flowers as stated in the facts of crime and assaulted the victim.

The defendant and the defense counsel disputing this issue shall not be accepted.

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) or more of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow