logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2014.11.20 2013구합2730
직업훈련비 반환 및 추가징수 처분 등
Text

All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a person running C, who is a long-term care institution for home care in Hamnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do.

나. 직업능력개발훈련의 실시 원고는 위탁교육업체인 챌린지러닝코리아 주식회사 및 브레인러닝코리아 주식회사(아래에서는 ‘이 사건 각 훈련기관’이라 한다)로부터 훈련비용의 부담 없이 직업능력개발훈련을 받을 수 있다는 제안을 받고서, 이 사건 각 훈련기관과 인터넷원격훈련의 방식으로 이루어지는 직업능력개발훈련 위탁계약을 체결하고 2010. 9. 8.부터 2011. 8. 7.까지 별지1 표 기재와 같은 내용으로 인터넷원격훈련을 실시하였다.

C. On February 27, 2013, the Gwangju Metropolitan Police Agency notified the Defendant of the investigation results that “The instant training institution received full subsidies from business owners, and received the subsidies from business owners after the completion of training as if the training fees were paid normally, and then, received the subsidies from business owners after the completion of training.” The notification of the investigation results by the Gwangju Metropolitan Police Agency notified the Defendant of the investigation results that “the Defendant obtained subsidies by fraud by issuing a false completion certificate to the trainees who did not complete the training course.”

On April 14, 2013, based on the investigation results by the Commissioner of the Gwangju Provincial Police Agency and the result of the investigation by the defendant, the defendant, including the defendant, filed a false completion of training for the plaintiff on April 14, 2013, on the ground that the plaintiff, "the plaintiff entrusted the training institution of this case with the training institution of this case, completed a false course of training for trainees who failed to meet the completion standards by manipulating the learning performance rate of the learning management system and sexual data, and received training fees through the transaction of training fees with each training institution of this case by false submission of evidentiary documents.

arrow