1. The defendant shall pay the plaintiff KRW 40,000,000.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

3.Paragraph 1.

1. Basic facts

A. On March 14, 2013, the Plaintiff leased Kimcheon-si D and 302 (hereinafter “instant housing”) from C by setting the lease deposit amount of KRW 40 million and the term of lease from August 31, 2013 to August 30, 2015, and paid the said lease deposit to C.

B. The above lease was implicitly renewed, and the Defendant purchased a multi-family house including the instant house from C and completed the registration of ownership transfer on September 1, 2016.

C. On July 2017, the Plaintiff notified the Defendant that he/she had no intent to renew the said lease contract.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the judgment and the above findings, since the above lease contract has terminated to the expiration of the term, the defendant who succeeded to the status of the lessor under the above lease contract shall return the above lease deposit to the plaintiff.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is accepted as reasonable.