logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2020.01.16 2019고정3
명예훼손
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 800,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2018. 6. 1.경 전주시 완산구 B아파트(이하 ‘B아파트’라고 한다)에서 '추종 동대표들과 노인회장(C)과 부녀회원(회장 D)들에게 묻겠습니다. 노인회장 C는 완산구청으로부터 나온 경로지원금(연간 약 500만 원)을 부녀회에 전폭 지원했고, 부녀회원들은 지난 2년간 E으로부터 시작된 온갖 의혹들을 퍼뜨렸지요 (중략) 경로지원금이 부녀회 활동비냐 책임져야지 발뺌하면 천벌 받는다.'라는 내용(이하 ‘이 사건 내용’이라 한다)이 기재된 유인물을 작성한 후, 위 유인물을 인쇄하여 위 B아파트 약 1,259세대의 우편함에 위 유인물(이하 ‘이 사건 유인물’이라 한다)을 투입하였다.

However, in fact, the above B apartment center consists of 55 male older persons and 61 female older persons. Among the above female older persons, 15,000 female older persons belong to a female council. The victim C used 720,000 out of 3,060,000 of the subsidies for operation of the center for senior citizens in 2017, which was received from the head of the Nansan-gu Office, for the above female older persons, and only used 1,006,570 out of the subsidies for operation of the center for senior citizens in 2016 for the above female older persons and did not have provided the center for senior citizens to the above female citizens.

Accordingly, the Defendant, by pointing out false facts, damaged the honor of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness C, F and G;

1. Materials printed by an emergency countermeasure committee;

1. The settlement of subsidies for the operation of centers for older persons in B apartment 2016;

1. The settlement of subsidies for the operation of centers for older persons in B apartment 2017;

1. Evidence and photographs of the distribution of printed articles;

1. A detailed statement of deposit transaction records of B apartment houses;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (related to submission of the list of senior citizens' associations and women's associations);

1. Relevant Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow