beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
From September 21, 2017 to around 22:30, the Defendant was aware of the Victim D (n, 34 years of age) and the Dog self-craft. From around September 21, 2017, the Defendant was able to use the Victim’s left side buckbucks in a F cafeteria in the E market during drinking at the victim’s seat. On the other hand, the Defendant continued to be able to use the Victim’s left side bucks in the E market, and the Defendant appears to have been written in writing at the frequency, but it appears to have been corrected as it appears to have been written in writing (Evidence No. 41 page of evidence record). From September 21, 2017, the Defendant took the back seat of the Htd vehicle and was seated on the right side of the victim, she was forced to have the Victim’s own buck, and she was forced to use the victim’s buck, one of the vehicle operation, and made the victim’s own buck.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D;
1. Relevant Article 298 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;
1. Article 16 (2) and (4) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes against which an order to provide community service or attend lectures is issued;
1. In full view of various circumstances, such as the Defendant’s age, occupation, family environment, social ties, the risk of recidivism, the disclosure and notification order, and the profits and effects expected by the employment restriction order, and disadvantage and side effects therefrom, there are special circumstances in which the Defendant’s personal information should not be disclosed, notified, or the Defendant should not be restricted from employment.