logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2017.07.07 2016고정642
재물손괴
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,00, and by a fine of KRW 300,000, respectively.

The defendants are the defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A, Defendant B, and Defendant C are the occupants of the apartment of macro-si, and Defendant A is the chairman of the council of occupants of the above apartment from January 1, 2015, Defendant B is the auditor of the above apartment from July 2015, Defendant C is the head of the passage of the above apartment of 105 units from January 1, 2015, Defendant C is the head of the above apartment of 105 units, the victim F is the head of the management office of the above apartment of 105 units from July 1, 2015, and the victim G is the occupant of the above E unit.

On the other hand, on October 23, 2015, at the representative meeting of occupants with the chairperson, Defendant A passed a decision on the suspension of duties from October 16, 2015 on the ground of the violation of the direction. On the other hand, the victim F applied for the suspension of duties to the Regional Labor Relations Commission around January 6, 2016, and on March 2, 2016, the Regional Labor Relations Commission issued a decision to revoke the recognition of the suspension of duties that the suspension of duties is unfair because the above suspension of duties was invalidated (the defendant A requested a review on the above determination, but submitted a written withdrawal on May 3, 2016). On the other hand, on February 1, 2016, the above resident representative meeting excluded only the victim F from the scope of succession to employment by changing the housing management business operator from H to H, and the victim F F excluded the case from the case subject to dismissal by the National Labor Relations Commission at issue on February 1, 2016 by the Central Labor Relations Commission.

As above, from July 2015, Defendant A and Victim F, who began to serve as the head of the victim F as the victim F, there is a problem of operation of the E apartment, payment of overtime work allowances for the victim F, and the qualification of the head of the management office.

arrow