Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in the operation of urban buses C.

On March 30, 2014, the Defendant driven the above bus on March 11, 201:30, and started from four-lanes from the direction of the head of the Silsan to the water source on the front of the bus stop of the new 1st apartment, which is located at the point of a rupture in the rupture-si.

At that time, the defendant was stopped and stopped to get passengers to get off, so there was a duty of care to prevent the passengers from falling off the bus by safely starting from the bus after checking the passengers' getting off and getting off.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and caused the victim D (or 70 years of age) to go back at the bus stops, which began from the rear door while the rear door was open, and caused the victim to go far away from the bus, and followed the victim's right side with the rear wheels of the bus.

After all, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as the 4th anniversary of the right-hand side in need of treatment for about 12 weeks due to the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., grounds for the suspended sentence) (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2009Da3248, Apr. 1, 2009).