logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원안산지원 2017.08.09 2017가단51498
건물명도(인도)
Text

1. The Plaintiff, the Defendant A, and the Defendant B, indicated in the attached Table No. 1, and the attached Table No. 2.

Reasons

1. Defendant A, C, or D;

(a) Indication of claims: To be as shown in the reasons for the claims;

(b) Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act (Voluntary Confession judgment)

2. Defendant B;

A. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of evidence Nos. 1 and 2 and evidence Nos. 2 and 3, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with Defendant B and the Plaintiff on January 22, 2013 regarding an apartment building listed in attached Table No. 2 (hereinafter “instant apartment”) as indicated in the attached Table No. 2 (hereinafter “instant apartment”) owned by the Plaintiff, with the term of lease from February 1, 2013 to January 31, 2015. The Plaintiff and Defendant B, at the time of the conclusion of the said lease agreement, may renew the lease agreement on a two-year basis, with the lessee who maintains the eligibility to occupy the national rental housing. In this case, the lessee shall accept the terms and conditions of the lease deposit, rent, etc. as determined by the lessor and notify the lessor of the intention to renew the lease agreement no later than one month before the expiration of the lease term, and the Defendant B, the owner of the instant apartment, without notifying the Plaintiff of the intention to renew the lease agreement.

B. As to this, Defendant B asserted to the effect that he has the right to possess the apartment of this case since the Plaintiff was in possession of the said money by making the Plaintiff live in the form of KRW 300,000 per month and continuing to live, but there is no evidence to acknowledge the above Defendant’s assertion.

C. The plaintiff's claim against the defendant B is justified and acceptable.

arrow