1. The plaintiff

A. Defendant C delivers a building listed in the separate sheet;

B. Defendant B is the above.

subsection (b).

1. Indication of Claim - On May 11, 2015, the Plaintiff concluded a lease agreement with Defendant C on the building indicated in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant building”) owned by the Plaintiff, and handed over the instant building.

- On April 19, 2017, the Plaintiff and Defendant C concluded a lease agreement on the above building again, and agreed that the lease deposit of KRW 10 million, monthly rent of KRW 250,000, and the lease period from May 27, 2017 to May 27, 2019 may be terminated in the event of arrears of at least two years.

- However, the Defendant did not pay the rent of KRW 6,50,000 for the term of 26 years at present, and the Plaintiff terminated the said lease contract by serving text messages on June 12, 2019 and copies of the instant complaint on June 13, 2019.

- On the other hand, Defendant B currently resides in the building of this case.

- Therefore, since the above lease contract was terminated by the plaintiff's declaration of legitimate termination, the defendant C has a duty to deliver the building of this case to the plaintiff, and the defendant B has a duty to leave the building of this case to the plaintiff who sought a claim for removal of interference based on ownership of the building of this case.

2. Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act (Judgment by public notice) of the applicable provisions of Acts;