A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 21:30 on June 29, 2018, the Defendant’s insultd the victim of the 'bruptivefighting’ in front of the Seogu Seo-gu, Daegu-gu (Seoul-gu) on the ground that the victim D, a police box affiliated with the Daegu Seo-gu Police Station C police station, dispatched to the scene after receiving the 112 report, was arrested as a flagrant offender on the ground that he assaulted the Defendant’s wife, and that E, etc. would have made the victim D’s “abrue, frue, brue, brue, but all brue,” and publicly insultingd the victim D with the large interest of “abrupted frupted flue, f

2. On June 29, 2018, the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender and transferred to the Daegu Seogu Seo-gu Police Station, and the Defendant spited F’s head with a defect head to fix the Defendant who was faced with F in his/her seat to the suspect’s seat, and spit F’s face.

As a result, the defendant assaulted police officers, thereby obstructing police officers from performing their legitimate duties in relation to the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D or F;

1. Application of investigation reports (in cases of crimes A, attaching CCTV images to a suspect), investigation reports (in cases of CCTV images inside a police box, etc.), and statutes;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act (within the scope of adding up long-term punishments);

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is that the defendant takes a bath to the police officer, and the police box also assaults the police officer to restrain the police officer from rioting, and the fact that the nature of the crime is not good is unfavorable.

However, the fact that the defendant confessions the crime of this case and repents the mistake, and that there is no particular punishment force except for punishment once by a fine due to drinking driving, etc. around 2002, and others.