logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.08.22 2013고단4223
장물취득
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant heard the horses that he purchases lost or stolen mobile phones from C or D at a high price, and produced the name cards and leaflets that he purchases lost or stolen smartphones, and distributed them to the taxi engineer.

1. On May 1, 2012, around 14:00, the Defendant reported the name cards distributed by the Defendant in front of the F in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Gwanak-gu, and purchased 4.5 million won and 4.5 million won with the knowledge of the fact that the 30 smartphones are stolen by the Defendant.

2. On May 14, 2012, at around 14:00, the Defendant reported the name cards distributed by the Defendant in front of the F in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Gwanak-gu, and purchased 4.5 million won and 4.5 million won with the knowledge of the fact that the Defendant was a stolen owner of smartphone from a person who was unaware of the name to sell smartphones.

3. On June 14, 2012, around 14:00, the Defendant reported the name cards distributed by the Defendant in front of the F in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Gwanak-gu, and purchased 4.5 million won and 4.5 million won with the knowledge of the fact that the Defendant was a stolen owner of smartphone from a person who was unaware of the name to sell smartphones.

4. On October 14, 2012, around 14:00, the Defendant reported the name cards distributed by the Defendant in front of the F in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Gwanak-gu, and purchased 300,000 won and 30,000 won with the knowledge of the fact that the Defendant was a stolen 8 smartphone from a person who was unaware of the name to sell a smartphone, a stolen.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol of C or D;

1. Application of the C Copy of the judgment;

1. Relevant Article 362 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 362 (1) of the choice of punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act provides that a suspended sentence shall be suspended (Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62(1) that has no previous record of the same type of crime, that the number of stolens acquired is more than four times, and that the defendant recognized his mistake and reflects the defendant)

arrow