1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of this court’s judgment citing the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as the ground of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence

[Plaintiff’s order of seizure and collection on November 2, 2012 against B’s claim for return of unjust enrichment was issued on November 15, 2012, and the Defendant collected B’s claim for return of unjust enrichment on June 20, 2013, which was after receiving the order of seizure and collection on November 15, 2012, which is the Plaintiff’s whole, and after receiving the order of seizure and collection, which is alleged to be contrary to B’s order of seizure and collection. However, the Defendant seized B’s claim for return of unjust enrichment on the ground that the Plaintiff’s claim for return of unjust enrichment was attached on June 20, 2012, which was before receiving the order of collection and delivery of inheritance tax on B, around June 20, 2012 (No. 5-1, 2, and 3). Although there was a fact that the Plaintiff received several orders after the aforementioned seizure, this is considered to have the effect of seizure and correction as one of the same disposition for succession after the same succession.

[2] Thus, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance with the same conclusion is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.