1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts (1) The head of Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Office publicly announced the residents' perusal to formulate an urban renewal acceleration plan concerning B, etc. on June 14, 2007;

(2) On July 4, 2013, the head of Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government publicly announced the authorization for the implementation of the Housing Redevelopment Improvement Project (hereinafter referred to as the “instant rearrangement project”) for the BBB Area implemented by the Defendant.

(D) On the other hand, on August 9, 1995, the Plaintiff’s punishment E completed the registration of initial ownership in relation to multi-household 2 multi-household 1 (5 households) (hereinafter “instant building”) located in the instant rearrangement zone, Seongbuk-gu Seoul, Seoul, and the Plaintiff completed the registration of initial ownership in relation to the instant building. On March 19, 1992, the date of the new construction of the instant building, the relocation report as the head of Seongbuk-gu Seoul, and the date of the public announcement of the authorization for the implementation of the instant rearrangement project is continuously registered in the same place after the date of the public announcement of the approval for the implementation of the instant rearrangement project.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 4-2, Gap evidence 5-7 (including provisional number), Eul evidence 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion from around 192 to two spouse and two children of Seongbuk-gu Seoul, and the Plaintiff leased KRW 30,000,000 to E at the time of the destruction of the old house and the new construction of the building of this case in Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, around 1995. Since then, the Plaintiff resided in the rooftop of the instant building that was newly constructed with his family members by converting this money into deposit for deposit, and then went back to the second floor of the instant building after December 201, and was separated from the two couples, but was residing in the dwelling room and the main room of the second floor.

Therefore, the Plaintiff constitutes a tenant of the instant building, who has resided in the instant improvement zone for more than three months at the time of the public inspection and announcement of the instant improvement plan, and thus, the Plaintiff constitutes 16,064,000 won for relocation expenses for four months in cases where the number of household members is four, and the occupied area is more than 33,000m2 and less than 49.5m