Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On September 11, 2016, at around 01:30 on September 11, 2016, on the ground that the Defendant, at the main point of “D” in the operation of the Victim C (Age 55) located in Daegu-gu B underground, Daegu-gu, the Defendant laid off the emergency exit beacon light (Garo 25cm x vertical 15cm x 15cm) installed between the first floor below the above main point and the first floor above the ground, and added the knife of the entrance by generating a string door (Garo 1m x vertical length 2m).

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the emergency exit beacon lights and entrance knobs, which are owned by the victim, to the extent that the total amount of KRW 90,000 is equivalent to the market value of the repair cost.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police suspect interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. Each statement and each investigation report (verification of the cost of repairing and repairing property damage, etc.);

1. Application of the video Acts and subordinate statutes of damaged property and photographs;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 366 of the Selection of Punishment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act was imposed on several occasions, and the above judgment was sentenced on May 14, 2015 to six months of imprisonment with prison labor, and two years of suspended execution, which became final and conclusive on May 22, 2015, and was under suspended execution, and committed the instant crime without being aware of the fact that the Defendant was under suspended execution. However, even though the Defendant was not well aware of the economic value of the damaged property, such as the fact that the Defendant repaid the damaged property to the victim and agreed to do so, the sentence is determined as ordered in light of the sentencing conditions favorable to the Defendant, other conditions favorable to the Defendant, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, and circumstances after the crime, etc.

Public Prosecution Rejection Parts

1. The Defendant of this part of the facts charged assaulted the victim E (year 23) when she takes care of the victim’s face by horse, drinking, etc., at the same time, at a place as set forth in paragraph (1).

2. The facts charged in this part of the judgment fall under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act.