beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's primary claim and the conjunctive claim are all dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. (i) On April 207, 2007, Es rink Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “SS rink Construction”) newly built and sold an apartment of 944 SVEW (hereinafter “the apartment of this case”). However, around August 3, 2008, at the time of the occupancy, a number of buyers with 1,000 units due to real estate economic depression, etc. did not pay the sales price, and the sales contract was cancelled and subsequently sold again, around September 3, 2009, 420 units of the unsold household were established by the Defendant, which is a asset-backed securitization company, and sold 420 units of the unsold household to the Defendant.
B. On January 1, 2010, the Plaintiff entered into a contract for support for resale with 573 households unsold in lots, which provides services, such as the sale of real estate by proxy, and entered into a contract for support for resale with EK construction to carry out the sale by proxy between January 1, 201 and June 30, 201, and then entered into a contract for support for resale with EK construction to carry out the support for sales by proxy, and until December 31, 201.
B. On February 28, 2011, the Plaintiff entered into a sales agency contract with the Defendant for 329 households, the 59 square meters or less among the 420 apartment units owned by the Defendant.
The main contents are as follows:
(hereinafter) In this regard, the household that the plaintiff has to sell in lots is eligible for the sales agency contract, and the sales agency contract of this case). The 34, 35, 39, 47, 49, and 59, 300,000 won of the total amount paid at KRW 3.5 million per 4,50,000 won per 3.5 million per 4,500,000 won per 4,500,000 won per 3.329 households per 125,000 won: 50% at the time of the sales contract, and 50% at the time of full payment: from March 1, 201 to December 31, 2011: the plaintiff is responsible for the duties assigned to the plaintiff, and the plaintiff is able to promote sales agency and sales in good faith.