logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.01.23 2016가합548082
대여금등
Text

1. Defendant B and C jointly and severally filed against the Intervenor succeeding to the Plaintiff KRW 196,642,311 as well as related thereto on June 15, 2018.

Reasons

Basic Facts

A. The Plaintiff (Withdrawal, hereinafter “Plaintiff”) incurred the instant loan claims, etc.

between March 4, 2010 and November 21, 2014, Defendant B (hereinafter “Defendant B”)

(2) The credit transaction agreement of each of the instant credit transaction agreements with the following contents (hereinafter “the credit transaction agreement of each of the instant case”), and the total amount of obligations arising from each of the instant credit transaction agreements is “the instant loan”.

After entering into a loan agreement, Defendant C entered into and executed the loan, and Defendant C entered into a joint and several guarantee agreement with the Plaintiff on the debt of Defendant B (hereinafter “joint and several guarantee agreement”) under each of the instant credit transaction agreements with the Plaintiff as follows.

As of August 4, 2016, the balance of the loan principal is as listed below. 20.20,00 per annum of 300,000,000 62,000,000 72,000,000 on March 4, 2010, 200. 10,000,000 6. 0,000,000 6. 20,000,000 6. 18,000 6. 10,00,000 6. 0,000 6. 10,00,00 7. 10,00 6. 20,00,00 6. 10,006,000 6. 6. 30,006,000 6. 130,008

Defendant B did not pay KRW 23,002,948 for the use of the instant credit card.

3) From May 24, 2016, Defendant B delayed the repayment of the instant loan from May 24, 2016. B. Defendant C, which entered into the instant mortgage agreement, was the real estate indicated in the separate sheet with Defendant D on February 24, 2016 (hereinafter “instant real estate”).

with respect to paragraph (1).

arrow