All appeals by the Defendants and the Prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Defendant A1) The Defendant was merely scambling the victim’s desire and scambling to prevent the scambling and scambling, and did not have the intent to assault or injure the victim.

2) The sentence of the lower court is too unreasonable.

B. Defendant B’s punishment is too unreasonable.

(c)

Each sentence of the lower court against the Defendants by the Prosecutor is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the lower court regarding Defendant A’s assertion of mistake of facts, the Defendant could recognize the fact that the Defendant intentionally assaulted the victim of bodily injury and inflicted bodily injury as stated in its reasoning. Therefore, the Defendant’s assertion of mistake of facts is

(1) A victim is consistently stating the fact that the defendant has brought about the head of the victim due to mass production.

② The Defendant also recognized the fact that the Defendant was probred to the victim.

③ According to CCTV images, it is confirmed that the head and the arms of the victim are unloaded by putting the end part of the mass acid, which the Defendant stopped and faced with the victim.

(4) The photograph taken by the victim’s diagnosis of injury to the victim and his/her body to injure shall also be consistent with the statements of the victim and CCTV images.

3. In full view of all the circumstances, including the extent of assault and injury inflicted by the Defendants to each other, the extent of injury, the background leading up to the Defendants to each other, and the circumstances where the Defendants had agreed upon revocation of each other’s complaint at the lower court, etc., the lower court’s punishment is only within the scope of reasonable discretion in the instant case where there is no change in the circumstances that are conditions for sentencing in the first instance court compared with the lower court, in view of the following: (a) the Defendants’ age, sexual conduct, environment, circumstances surrounding the crime, and circumstances after the crime.