1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 90,426,245 to the Plaintiff and KRW 10% per annum from November 30, 2016 to January 16, 2017; and (b) the Plaintiff.

No dispute between the parties, or comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the statements and arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, the Plaintiff: (a) provided credit guarantee for the Defendant’s Daegu Bank on June 5, 2013; (b) provided credit guarantee for the Defendant’s loans to the Defendant’s Daegu Bank on June 4, 2014; (c) under a credit guarantee agreement between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, the Defendant agreed to pay the Plaintiff the amount of subrogated payment; (d) the amount of subrogated payment; and (e) the amount of liquidated payment; (e) the amount of liquidated payment; (e) the amount of liquidated payment; (e) the amount of liquidated payment; and (e) the amount of liquidated payment; and (e) the amount of a credit guarantee accident under which the Defendant delayed the above loan; and (e) the Plaintiff subrogated the Daegu Bank on November 30, 2016; and (e) the amount of damages set forth in Article 35 of the Credit Guarantee Fund Act on February 1, 2016.

According to the above facts, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff the above amount of 90,426,245 won and damages for delay calculated at the rate of 10% per annum under the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings from the following day to the date of full payment, which is clearly recorded that the original copy of the payment order was served on the defendant from November 30, 2016, which is the date of vicarious payment, until January 16, 2017.

If so, the plaintiff's claim shall be accepted for the reasons and it is so decided as per Disposition.