Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On February 3, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for a violation of the Defense Justice at the Seoul High Court (Seoul High Court) on two years, and the judgment became final and conclusive on February 11, 2017.

C is the representative of “D”, a company that develops, manufactures, and sells energy-saving products, and the Defendant is the representative of “E”, a company that installs LED lighting Do, retail and electricity facilities, and F is the representative of “G”, a company that sells materials necessary for electrical construction.

Electrical construction shall not be contracted or executed by a person other than a construction business operator, and a person who intends to conduct a construction business shall register with the Special Metropolitan City Mayor, Metropolitan City Mayor, Do Governor or Special Self-Governing Province branch having jurisdiction over the location of

Around April 10, 2013, the Defendant, without registering with the competent authority, was awarded a contract for the “H” construction work from D to KRW 165,00,000 for the large amount of KRW 165,00.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect prepared by each police officer against F and C;

1. A contract for construction works for the projects for improving accusations, street lamps, etc., written confirmation, contract for construction works for the improvement of street lamps, and contract for construction works;

1. Application of an inquiry letter, such as criminal history, and reporting on the result of confirmation before and after the disposition;

1. Article 42 of the Act and Articles 42 subparagraph 1 and 4 (1) of the Act concerning the relevant criminal facts, the selective electrical construction business, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 37 of the Criminal Act for the treatment of concurrent crimes: Provided, That Article 39 (1) shall apply;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the order of provisional payment are as follows: (a) the defendant is aware of the criminal facts of this case and reflects his mistake; and (b) the fact that the judgment should be judged simultaneously with the crime of violation of the law of defense with the final and conclusive judgment and the fact that equity should be considered should be considered as favorable to the defendant

However, the crime of this case, which the defendant received electrical construction without registering the construction business, is the contents and method of the crime.