logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.07.18 2017고단1618
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치사상)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10 million.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Death or injury caused before the risk) is a person engaging in driving coo cars in E.

On September 8, 2016, when the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol 0.106% in blood, the Defendant driven the said vehicle while driving the said vehicle on a 23-lane route in Seocho-gu Seoul New Distribution, and had a duty of care to safely drive the vehicle on the front side and the right and the right and the right and the right of the vehicle while driving the vehicle on the five-lane route in Seocho-gu, Seoul. However, the Defendant was negligent in driving the vehicle on the front side while neglecting the speed of the vehicle in a situation where it is difficult to drive the vehicle due to the influence of alcohol, such as a non-distance of the body due to the influence of alcohol, while driving the vehicle on the front side of the passenger F (FF, 57 years old) while stopping in the front on the front side. The Defendant got the front part of the vehicle of the Defendant, due to the shock, was pushed the said cargo on the front part of the vehicle of the Defendant and got the victim from the front part of the vehicle in the front part (IH).

Ultimately, the Defendant, by its occupational negligence, argued that the victim F, who is the driver of the above G Poter freight in question, suffered from the injury, such as a tension and fluoral tension and salt fluor, and the injury to the victim J (37 years old) who is the fluor of the above Poter freight in need of approximately two weeks of treatment, and the injury, such as a fluoral fluoral fluoral fluor, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment (the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol at the time of the instant accident, but did not reach a difficult condition of normal driving, and thus, the Defendant was under the following circumstances acknowledged by the following macroscence. In other words, the Defendant, after the said accident, was at the outside of the road on which the said Poter was the driver of the said I Poter freight in need of treatment for about two weeks of treatment.

arrow