The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant operates a dog in D in Jeonyang-gun, Jeonyang-gun, and the victim E (the aged 55) leases the said livestock shed to the Defendant and operates the said D restaurant immediately next to the said livestock shed.

The Defendant and the above victim, from around 2012, when the Defendant had started to raise 400 gale, continued to demand the above victim to keep the Defendant in mind of the opening, and the Defendant frequently argued that “Nek did not directly open the opening and cafeteria,” and “Nek did not directly open the opening and cafeteria.”

At around 19:00 on July 17, 2013, the Defendant, when intending to enter the said dog with the walk to put him into the said dog, and to take a walk ton of F.1 ton of the Defendant, the Defendant: (a) intending to snn of the said dog; (b) see the horses that “the restaurant customers walk to wn to wal off the dog because of smell,” and had the said walk to have the said walk to walk to wn to wale the said walk to wn to walk the said walk to walk to walk the said walk to walk to walk the said walk to walk to walk the said walk of the said walk to walk to walk the said walk to the said walk to prevent the said 2nd.

2. Determination and conclusion

A. A witness G (e.g., a relatively neutral police officer) who appears in a relatively neutral position was unable to discover the victim’s external situation at that time and stated in this court; the witness E’s legal statement and the contents of legal reconsideration; the attitude in this court; and the fact that the defendant and the above E continue to have a long-term conflict relationship for a certain period, etc., face value.