logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 정읍지원 2013.08.13 2013고단302
사기미수등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, as to the Defendants for two years from the date of the final judgment of this case, the Defendants are above.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. At around 13:00 on February 28, 2013, the Defendant: (a) placed a fire to remove miscellaneous grass in his mulberry tree dry field located in Jeong-si, Jung-si, and was negligent in leaving the field without completely extinguishing the fire; (b) caused the fire to a 125 weeks adjacent to D; and (c) caused the fire to a 87 million market price, including 125 weeks adjacent to D and 6 weeks.

B. On March 16, 2013, at the Defendant’s house located in Jung-gu, Jung-gu, Jung-dong, the Defendant: (a) stated that “I would die because there is no way to compensate for the payment of fire by the inside; (b) NA was paid; and (c) B would cause B to make a statement as if B did not have any fire; and (d) caused B to escape by making B state a false statement that B would have a slope F, at the Criminal Team office of the Jung-Eup Police Station at Jung-Eup Police Station on March 22, 2013, the Defendant instigated B to escape as follows 2.

2. On March 22, 2013, Defendant B made a false statement to the effect that, although the Defendant did not have destroyed D-owned forest by burning fire at the Jung-gu Eup Police Station, Defendant B received the above A’s teacher and went to the sloping F, and caused the sloping F to turn off the water by hand.

Accordingly, the defendant, who committed a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment, was allowed to escape.

3. The Defendants, while entering the issue of compensation for damages in the above-mentioned 1-A cases, conspired to acquire the insurance money by pretending that Defendant B did not pay any money to the victim Matz Fire Insurance Co., Ltd. as if Defendant B did not pay any money.

Defendant

B around March 25, 2013, the fact that the victim's call call of the victim company was paid A, and even though B did not have paid a fire, the victim's call was received as if B had paid a fire, and the above date and time was paid by B.

arrow