Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving freight B and B.

On February 2, 2019, at around 13:50, the Defendant proceeded from C to D apartment at the speed of about 3.1km from C to D apartment.

Since there is no signal signal, the driver has a duty of care to safely drive the steering system by properly manipulating the steering and steering system.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded to the right side from the left side of the Defendant’s negligence, and received the right side part of the FVL125 U.S. driving on the right side of the victim E(75 years old).

Ultimately, at around 15:29 on the same day, the Defendant caused the death of the victim due to the two parts of the H Hospital located in Gwangju Dong-gu G, Gwangju and the right plehion.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A traffic accident report and a report on each traffic accident;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on a written autopsy;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and selection of imprisonment without prison labor

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (hereinafter referred to as “the grounds for suspended sentence”) [the grounds for suspended sentence] [the scope of recommendation and recommendation] - the mitigated area, and the imprisonment without prison labor for April to one year: The general traffic accident report of the Ministry of Transport and Maritime Affairs [Type 2] the special person who caused the death of a traffic accident - the mitigated element: the mitigated element: the victim was eventually dead due to the instant traffic accident, which is very serious result in the crime.

However, the fact that the victim's bereaved family members do not want to punish the defendant by mutual consent with the victim's bereaved family members, and the defendant has lived faithfully without any prior to the crime of this case.