logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원여주지원 2016.08.10 2015가단21211
건물등철거
Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

A. Of the land size of 572 square meters of C forest land in Yju-si, each point of the attached Form 5, 6, and 7 shall be in sequence.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is the owner of D Daeju-si 590 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”) and E large 620 square meters (hereinafter “instant land 2”) and the red brick sloping roof housing on the ground of the instant land No. 1 (hereinafter “instant housing”), and the Defendant is the owner of C forest land and 572 square meters adjacent to the instant land (hereinafter “Defendant’s land”).

B. On July 29, 2014, the Defendant obtained permission from the Innju Mayor to change the form and quality of land to create a housing complex and site due to entry into a housing complex (hereinafter “instant permission”) on the Defendant’s land, and filed a report on the construction of a structure that constructs a reinforced soil retaining wall with a height of 3.9 meters and 57 meters in length at the FMyeon on August 21, 2014 for the said development project.

다. 피고는 2013.경 원고에게 피고의 토지 중 약 100~150평 정도를 평당 50만 원에 매수할 것을 요청한 바 있고, 2014. 11.경에는 원고에게 이 사건 제1, 2토지와 인접한 피고의 토지 중 이 사건 제1, 2토지 쪽으로 뾰족하게 돌출된 부분 2곳(별지1 도면 표시 음영처리된 부분 합계 약 14평)을 평당 100만 원에 매수할 것을 제의하였으나, 원고는 가격이 너무 높다고 생각하여 피고의 제안을 거절하였다. 라.

On December 2014, the Defendant installed a retaining wall (hereinafter “the retaining wall of this case”) equivalent to 3.9m high (hereinafter “the retaining wall of this case”) on the instant land Nos. 1, 2, and the Defendant’s land boundary line (the part connecting each point in sequence 1 through 5, 7, 8, and 9), and installed a retaining wall of about 2m high (hereinafter “the retaining wall of this case”) in addition to the retaining wall of this case, attached Form 1, attached in the order of 5, 6, and 7.

The current status of the installation of the second retaining wall of this case is as follows:

E. Although the land No. 2 of this case adjoins to the road, the land No. 1 of this case is a franchisium.

The plaintiff is installed with a retaining wall of this case.

arrow