The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the sentence of the court below (the first crime of the Daejeon District Court 2016 High Court 2016 High Court 3644 case and the second crime of the 2016 High Court 2016 High Court 3797 case: Imprisonment for 2 months and the second crime of the judgment: 10 months) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

The Defendant recognized all the crimes of this case and reflected, and the amount of damage is relatively large.

It is not visible, and in the case of crimes in the ruling of the Daejeon District Court 2016 High Order 3644, the first crime in the ruling of the Daejeon District Court 2016 High Order 2016 High Order 3797, the equity in the case of larceny is favorable.

However, there is a disadvantage to the fact that it does not know about during the suspended execution period for the same crime, and again commits larceny against many victims, and that it is not agreed with the victims, and that it seems that there is no support for the recovery of particular damage.

In full view of the above circumstances and other conditions of sentencing, such as the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable as it is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.