1. The Defendant’s KRW 46,838,411 as well as 5% per annum from September 27, 2014 to February 5, 2015 to the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. After the Plaintiff was established on June 3, 2010 as a company that runs the business of manufacturing electronic equipment and precision system, the Plaintiff purchased the eroding machine for the manufacture of external panels on October 12, 2010 (hereinafter “instant machine”).

The instant machinery is designed so that the work executor may, in advance, put a metal plate on the front side of the machinery of about 3 meters and then, if the blades installed on the floor are cut off by using a metal plate on the front side of the machinery, and then sticking on the upper press, then use the pressure so that the metal plate may be carried out. In this case, multiple different blades suitable for each process of the upper press of the machinery may be carried out at the same time.

B. Examining the operating method of the instant machine more detailedly, a mobile gambling box installed on the floor is equipped with a cover. Within that, there is a cover ped ped ped ped ped ped ped ped ped ped ped ped ped ped ped ped ped ped ped her on the right side (hereinafter referred to as “n ped ped ped ped ped ped ped ped c.). When a work operator takes a ped ped ped ped ped ped ped c., the interval between the upper upper press of the instant machine and the lower press of the instant machine would be 14 cm (hereinafter referred to as “safety ped ped d.”) and when a work operator takes a ped ped ped ped ped d. for about 1.7 seconds, the difference between the upper press and the lower press d. d. d. m. to take the ped ped ped ped ped ped c. (hereinafter referred to as “safety m.”).

Therefore, the workmen using the instant machinery using the metal board using only the spawn, while keeping the said machinery in the working spawn.