The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the punishment of imprisonment (eight months) of the original judgment is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment appears to be against his own mistake, and the fact that the defendant is punished for the same kind of crime or has no criminal record exceeding the fine, etc. is recognized as a favorable circumstance for the defendant.

However, considering the fact that the act of arranging sexual traffic does not have a significant social hazard, such as harming the sound sexual culture and good morals by commercializing women's sex, and that there is a need for strict punishment in order to prevent the spread of illegal sexual traffic establishments and to establish a sound sexual culture, there is no special circumstance or change of circumstances that may be newly considered in the sentencing after the decision of the court below, and other various sentencing conditions that are shown in the records and arguments, such as the defendant's age and behavior environment, circumstances before and after the crime, etc., the punishment of the court below is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.