logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.04.21 2017고합20
공직선거법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 800,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No person shall publish false facts with respect to the act, etc. of a candidate in favor of a candidate by means of a speech, broadcast, newspaper, communication, magazine, poster, propaganda document, or other means, with the intention of getting elected or having another person elected.

The Defendant was a member of the National Assembly who was elected in the constituency E for the 20th National Assembly member, which was implemented on April 13, 2016. The fact was that F was designated as a project district for the strengthening project of the total project cost of KRW 294.4 billion around July 11, 2015. However, for the purpose of election in the above election, the Defendant promulgated false facts regarding Defendant’s election campaign bulletin from March 24, 2016 to April 10, 2016, stating that “the securing of the budget of KRW 299.4 billion” or “F2,94.4 billion budget security” or “the securing of budget” to the North Korea of the Republic of Korea by distributing or transmitting it to the voters.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Each police statement made against H, I, J, K, L, or M;

1. The chief of the accusation (2016 type No. 23474, No. 2 of the evidence list), the application for a ruling (No. 43 of the evidence list), the supplementary statement of the application for a ruling (No. 49 of the evidence list), a copy of the original document of the written objection (Evidence No. 110 of the evidence list);

1. Each investigation report (including the documents attached Nos. 28, 30, 53 and 53 of the evidence list);

1. No. 1 (No. 36), evidence No. 2 (No. 4), evidence No. 3 (No. 5) (No. 4), evidence No. 4 (No. 6), evidence No. 4 (the output of the output of the decision of the N election management commission, No. 27 of evidence No. 4, evidence No. 36 of the broadcast discussions (Evidence No. 36 of the evidence list), evidence No. 4 and interview (Evidence No. 50 of the evidence list), evidence documents against the objection (Evidence No. 111).

arrow