logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.09.12 2018나2019864
소유권이전등기
Text

1. All appeals by the defendant against the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, and this case is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except for the following modifications.

[Revision] Each "Bide" of the attached Forms 2, 13 and 14 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be considered as "real estate stated in the attached Form."

On the 2nd judgment of the first instance court, the provisional registration of the right to claim the transfer of ownership is the provisional registration of the right to claim the transfer of ownership (hereinafter “the provisional registration of this case”) under Section 17 of the judgment of the second instance, and the “receiving” is added after “the provisional registration of this case” and “the provisional registration of this case.”

In the third part of the judgment of the court of first instance, the phrase “after completing the provisional registration of transfer of ownership” under the third part of the judgment of the court of first instance is understood as “after completing the provisional registration of this case.

No. 17 of the first instance court's decision No. 4, "no evidence exists," and "no evidence exists, and according to this, the transfer registration of ownership transfer in the name of the defendant is the registration invalidation of the cause." There is no evidence from Ghana to 17-18.

'The portion' is as follows:

“On the other hand, the Defendant also has the same purport as to the stamp image affixed on the deceased’s name on the Preliminary Registration (Evidence A No. 5), which is the cause document of the provisional registration of this case (However, the Defendant made a statement that is partially contrary to the person’s statement in the first instance trial on the PPP and the PPPP and the PPPP and the PPP, but considering the following as a whole: (a) the Defendant’s statement was made in the first instance; (b) the process of the instant lawsuit prior to the Defendant’s statement; and (c) the process of the treatment of the deceased and the health conditions at the time of the preparation of the document; (d) while it is difficult to believe the Defendant’s statement at the

Furthermore, it is deemed that the defendant's above statement contained a statement in the court of first instance to the effect that the person's statement in the court of first instance is withdrawn and returned.

Even if the plaintiffs are already the defendant in the first instance trial.

arrow