Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in daily work, and the victim B is a driver of the main shop C, and the victim D is a police officer working in the E branch.

A. On May 21, 2014, at around 00:30 on May 21, 2014, the Defendant was unable to pay the drinking value to the “C main store ” operated by the Victim B located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-do, but was able to provide food equivalent to KRW 40,000 to customers, such as Creju 5 C and Creju, and 40,000, and took profits on property without justifiable grounds.

B. After engaging in the same act as the one prior to interference with the business, the victim, who demanded the drinking value, interfered with the main place of the business, such as causing fears to other table visitors, such as causing fears to other table visitors over about 30 minutes of the defendant's table, as he saw his employees by using other table table, as he saw his employees, and cutting off the beer with the beer's disease on the table of the defendant's table, etc.

(c)

In the case of demand for verification of identity by 1 a policeman belonging to E District, who was dispatched after being reported as 'A' or 'B' due to the acts of this paragraph, the 200 Ma200 Ma200

“A bitch bitch bitch of Korean police”,

A public insult was made at the main place of business, such as "welves", and at the place where customers are located.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. A complaint and a written statement (D);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on the receipt of victims and field photographs;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Articles 314(1), 347(1) and 311 of the Criminal Act, the choice of fines for criminal facts, and the choice of fines;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;