1. The Plaintiff:

A. The Defendants: (i) deliver the buildings listed in the separate sheet, and (ii) jointly and severally do so from March 24, 2015.

1. Basic facts

A. The pertinent Plaintiff between the Plaintiff and the Defendants is the owner of the building indicated in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant apartment”). The Defendants, as married couple, are occupying the instant apartment while living in the instant apartment.

B. The Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendant B 1) The Plaintiff is a Korea Cmat Bank Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Cmat Bank”) around 2003.

A) Defendant B’s solicitation that served in Defendant B started trading of fund products, deposits, etc., and around July 2007, around KRW 500 million in the account in Defendant C’s name, around February 2009, KRW 550 million in total and KRW 1 billion in the account in Defendant B’s name (hereinafter “instant funds”).

(2) The Plaintiff requested the return of the instant funds. Defendant B returned KRW 150 million to the Plaintiff on September 3, 2009, and returned KRW 300 million to the Plaintiff by the end of January 201 and returned the remainder of KRW 900 million by the end of August 201.

Interest shall be seven percent per annum.

to provide a registration certificate until full return.

“C) The Defendant B returned each of the KRW 100 million to the Plaintiff around January 2010 and KRW 100 million around February 2010. With respect to the remainder of KRW 700 million, upon the Plaintiff’s request, the Defendants jointly owned the apartment of this case (Defendant B 12/17 shares, Defendant C5/17 shares) with the maximum debt amount of KRW 70 million, the obligor C, the mortgagee, and the mortgagee Nonparty D registered the establishment of the first-class collective security right, and around March 3, 2011, the Plaintiff would pay KRW 70 million to the Defendants up to 70 billion until June 2013, 201.