A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, as a person who runs chain business with the trade name of Koyang-gu Co., Ltd., Ltd., and as an employer of the victim E (the age of 31) who was employed as accounting staff from January 2, 2017, was in the position of protecting and supervising the victim.

At around 10:50 on January 31, 2017, the Defendant, at the Defendant’s office located in the above Co., Ltd. D, had the victim with a resume related to the interview of the accounting staff who will proceed on the same day, should manage the victim “at the age of the new employee coming from the day.”

all duties shall be performed well.

b) Doese;

per is a company's horse, and the manager of the company should be aware of the company's failure.

Is it possible to do so.

“The victim knife by hand, knife the victim’s knife, knife the victim’s knife, knife the victim’s knife, knife the victim’s knife, knife the victim’s knife, and knife the victim’s knife, knife the victim’s knife, knife, the victim

Accordingly, the defendant committed an indecent act by force against the victim under the supervision of the defendant due to employment relationship.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of police statement protocol to E;

1. Relevant provisions of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes and Article 10 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes concerning the crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The crime of this case with the reason for sentencing under Article 16(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes committed by the Defendant is an indecent act by force against the victim employed by the Defendant, and the crime is not good in light of the circumstances and degree of the crime, and the victim was easily informed of the huge mental shock that makes it difficult for the victim to receive, and the fact that the victim was unable to receive a letter from the victim is disadvantageous.

On the other hand, the defendant recognizes the crime and the victim.