Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 17:00 on January 7, 2015, the Defendant obstructed the business by hearing the words that the head of the hospital did not leave the hospital, while demanding the head of the waiting room in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government to promptly leave the hospital, and by stating that the victim E (57 years of age) (a staff member of the above hospital), who is an internal patient, was in charge of the above hospital, brought the victim E (57 years of age) to the hospital site, and put the patient into the hospital site, and interfered with the victim’s hospital management duties by taking 20 minutes or more until police officers called the victim’s flaps and flaps, etc.

2. The Defendant publicly insultingd the victim F (the 27 years old), a police officer, who was dispatched to the scene after receiving a report on 112 on the said date, time and place as above, on a multiple occasions, the victim F (the 27 years old), who is a police officer, and was sent to the scene, such as “I wish to die in the dog, sprinke, nibs, and sphers,” before viewing the persons related to the hospital and the patients.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and G;

1. Each statement of H and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photograph victims;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act: A variety of violence crimes have been committed again within the period of probation, and the crime of this case has been committed in favor of him/her, such as the fact that the nature of the crime is not good: the victim E of the obstruction of business, the victim E of the obstruction of business, and the head of the hospital et al. expressed his/her intent that he/she does not want the punishment of the defendant, and it is difficult to see that the result of damage as a contingent crime is significant.