logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2016.02.15 2015고단1369
공무집행방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2015 Highest 1369]

1. On September 24, 2015, the Defendant reported that there was a person who interferes with traffic by leaving a glass disease in the wooden railway station located in Sinpo-ro 98, Mapo-si, Sinpo-si, Mapo-si on September 24, 2015, and received inquiries about the circumstances of the instant case from D, who was dispatched to the site after receiving a report from D, the security guards belonging to Sinpo-si, Sinpo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si.

C. The name of thep, the head of the Dong, the head of the Dong, the head of the Dong, the head of the Dong, the head of the Dong, the head of the Dong, the head of the Dong, the head of the Dong, the head of the Dong, the head of the Dong, the head of the Dong, and the head

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

[2016 order 24]

2. On January 10, 2016, the Defendant assaulted the Defendant, who was requested by H to present an identification card at the scene after receiving a report of 112 that there was a person who is in a disturbance in F “F” located in Sinpo City 09:10 on January 10, 2016, and was dispatched to the scene by the police officer assigned to the Bapo Police Station G police station, and was requested by H to present an identification card, such as “this Y Y...........” on the left face of H due to his hand

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

[Judgment 1] Facts 1, 2015 order 1369]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Investigation report (packer telephone call) (the fact of the judgment No. 2, the order of 2016, the order of 24);

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with H;

1. 112 Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the details of handling reported cases;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment (elective of imprisonment);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (the following sentencing shall be taken into account):

1. Consideration of the protection and observation and the sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order;

1. Determination of types of crimes: Group 1 that interferes with the performance of official duties;

2. Determination of the scope of sentence: Each basic area, six months to one year and four months (no person who is subject to special sentencing):

3. Standards for handling multiple crimes: From six months to two years.

arrow